Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Simpson

Citations

  • 462 A.2d 821
  • 316 Pa. Super. 115
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the specific intent to commit a crime may be inferred from the defendant’s words or conduct or from the circumstances of the case together with all reasonable inferences therefrom
  • finding that defendant applying pressure to victim’s throat and starting to remove his pants constituted a substantial step toward commission of rape
  • stating that the test for determining whether an offense is a lesser included offense is whether or not all of the key elements of the lesser offense are contained in the greater offense
  • observing that “if a simple assault is used to overcome the volition of a rape victim and force her submission, the assault and the rape would be a single act.”
  • affirming attempted rape conviction where defendant went inside victim’s bedroom, put an object to her throat and began loosening his -7- J-A29032-22 jogging pants, but victim’s yells for help caused defendant to flee
  • Appellant could be sentenced for both burglary and attempted rape under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3502(d) because the latter offense is a felony of second degree.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosky, Rowley and Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.