Commonwealth v. Simpkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that defendant helped shooters before killing and was accessory after fact did not necessarily imply “knowing participation ... in the shooting itself or in the planning thereof’
• evidence that defendant helped shooters before killing and was accessory after fact did not necessarily imply \knowing participation . . . in the shooting itself or in the planning thereof\
• “evidence of motive” helps “demonstrate the requisite intent”
• \evidence of motive\ helps \demonstrate the requisite intent\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).