Commonwealth v. Showers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that decision to limit cross-examination of Commonwealth’s forensic psychiatrist was reasonable because “an extended cross-examination might have allowed [the expert] to restate his opinion -9- J-S62020-17 regarding the deceased’s risk of suicide”
• concluding that decision to limit cross-examination of Commonwealth’s forensic psychiatrist was reasonable because “an extended cross-examination might have allowed [the expert] to restate his opinion -9- J-S62020-17 regarding the deceased’s risk of suicide”
• discretion regarding scope and manner of cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).