Commonwealth v. Sheritt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Title VII does—in certain instances—protect against post-employment retaliation.” (citing Robinson v. Shell Oil Co., 519 U.S. 337, 346 (1997); Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co., 108 F.3d 462, 466 (2d Cir. 1997))
• “Under federal law the only proper defendant in a Title VII claim is the plaintiff’s employer—no Title VII claim lies against the executives or other employees of the employer.” (citing Lore v. City of Syracuse, 670 F.3d 127, 169 (2d Cir. 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).