Commonwealth v. Shelton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding video recording of a forensic interview constituted a recorded recollection for purposes of Pa.R.E. 803.1(3)
• affirming admission of forensic interview where the victim testified at trial that her memory was much better at the time the video was made
• finding victim’s recorded fifteen-minute forensic interview not cumulative because it reported events more fully than trial testimony, which displayed lack of recollection as to events in question
• upholding admission of forensic interview pursuant to that exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ward
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-06-01· cited 30×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tyson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-10· cited 303×
• Commonwealth v. Huggins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-07· cited 140×
• Commonwealth v. Young
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-01-22· cited 133×