Commonwealth v. Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s theory was unsupported and conjectural because victim had no need to justify sexual episode to third person, and therefore, evidence did not show motive to fabricate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Harmon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-06-18· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Bradley
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-11-23· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Seap Sa
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-06-30· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Herrick
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-10-02· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bohannon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-07-25· cited 176×
• Commonwealth v. Joyce
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-06· cited 136×
• Commonwealth v. Chretien
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-03-09· cited 75×
• Commonwealth v. Mosby
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1980-12-12· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Elder
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-07-22· cited 57×
• Commonwealth v. Frey
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-09-23· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Fetzer
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-04-22· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Heath
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-07-07· cited 4×