Commonwealth v. Sendele

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• bundles of worn bills, mostly ten- and twenty-dollar bills, but also some fifties and hundreds, totaling $33,020
• 14.4 grams of 37 per cent pure cocaine in rock form, standing alone, might not be sufficient to justify inference of intent to distribute
• narcotics officers were permitted to testify as to their opinion that content of vial was for defendant’s personal us'e but the cocaine in the valise was intended for distribution
• “[possession of a large quantity of an illicit narcotic raises an inference of intent to distribute”
• “Possession of a large quantity of an illicit narcotic raises an inference of intent to distribute”
• possession of large quantity of narcotics with considerable street value, combined with other factors, raise inference of intent to distribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).