Massachusetts Appeals Court· 10/29/1990
Commonwealth v. Sena
Citations
- 561 N.E.2d 528
- 29 Mass. App. Ct. 463
- 1990 Mass. App. LEXIS 583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that a judge’s failure to give a promised jury charge, where the defendant relied on that promise in formulating trial strategy, may be reversible error
- judge gave a “clear signal” that he would deliver the proposed instruction but did not do so; judge’s incorrect statement of the law required reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Kaplan, Ireland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SimcockMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-08-06· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CalcagnoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-07-05· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-08-11· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-05-24· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. UrbanMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-09-11· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. ResendesMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-04-05· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. CrawfordMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-03-08· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-04-23· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-01-21· cited 757×
- Commonwealth v. ZagranskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-08-13· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. SCHATVENMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-11-12· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. BryerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-07-10· cited 46×
- Commonwealth v. CorcioneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-02-15· cited 40×
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-08-09· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. FulghamMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-01-20· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.