Commonwealth v. Seay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
• concluding that when a direct appeal is still pending, a premature PCRA petition must be quashed
• holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
• holding that “[w]here a PCRA petition is premature, we quash an appeal taken from a ruling on it”
• holding that the PCRA cannot be invoked until judgment of sentence is final
• concluding Superior Court was required to quash appeal from denial of PCRA relief, because PCRA petition was premature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Com. v. Smith, S.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-12-21· cited 48×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-27· cited 4,184×
• Commonwealth v. Finley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-31· cited 4,104×
• Commonwealth v. Kubis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-19· cited 92×
• Commonwealth v. Blackwell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-09-12· cited 47×