Commonwealth v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a - 10 - J-S25004-23 claim that the trial court relied on ex parte information not of record presents a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Downing
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-02-23· cited 273×
• Com. v. Campbell, Q.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-10-20

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Grant
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-31· cited 1,205×
• Commonwealth v. Guth
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-24· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Schwartz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-02-01· cited 43×