Commonwealth v. Scott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “No evidence was presented to suggest the officers believed [the. non-parolee] to be armed and dangerous, warranting a search for their protection.”
• “No evidence was presented to suggest the officers believed [the non-parolee] to be armed and dangerous, warranting a search for their protection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Deck
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-09· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Mathis, D., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 30×
• Commonwealth v. Mathis
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-09-22· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Diego
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-06-23· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Tsopanis-Sellari
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-09-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Commonwealth v. Ayala
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-06· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Chernosky
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-04-27· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-02· cited 20×
• Com. v. Frisbie
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-06· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Roland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-06· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Wagstaff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-06· cited 5×