Commonwealth v. Schultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting new trial rather than evidentiary hearing, where this Court found counsel’s actions were unsubstantiated, and a remand for an evidentiary hearing would be a waste of precious judicial time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Wood
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-03· cited 59×
• Commonwealth v. Dickerson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-03· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-01· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Neely
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-28· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Tippens
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-10-23· cited 12×
• Com. v. Durrett King, C.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-08-29· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Glover
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-27· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Belmonte
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-08· cited 8×