Skip to main content
· 4/27/1983

Commonwealth v. Schomaker

Citations

  • 461 A.2d 1220
  • 501 Pa. 404
  • 1983 Pa. LEXIS 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prohibition against double jeopardy requires that defendant’s acquittal for conspiracy bar his retrial for theft by deception; such retrial would require relitigation of the same issues
  • amendments simply amplifying allegations of the original complaint are not subject to the application of the statute of limitations
  • where indictment seeks conviction upon a theory of intentional criminal conduct, the Commonwealth must confine its proof to that theory and a jury instruction permitting conviction upon a theory of recklessness is reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zappala, Roberts, Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.