Commonwealth v. Schmincke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in Hammond we held that “an employee must be allowed to choose which system he or she desires to come under if the state does not provide an offsetting advantage”
• regarding the State's recapture of early retirement benefits after members retired, retained PERS membership, and then re-entered public employment
• regarding the State’s recapture of early retirement benefits after members retired, retained PERS membership, and then re-entered public employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).