Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Schmidt

Citations

  • 919 A.2d 241
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 50
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that two separate criminal episodes do not constitute the same offense within the meaning of the double jeopardy clauses
  • overlap in time of two investigations, and subsequent presentments, concerning appellant was not dispositive and temporal relationship did not lead to conclusion they were part of the same criminal episode where appellant simultaneously participated in two different drug organizations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green, Lally, Popovich, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.