Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/23/2007
Commonwealth v. Schmidt
Citations
- 919 A.2d 241
- 2007 Pa. Super. 50
- 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that two separate criminal episodes do not constitute the same offense within the meaning of the double jeopardy clauses
- overlap in time of two investigations, and subsequent presentments, concerning appellant was not dispositive and temporal relationship did not lead to conclusion they were part of the same criminal episode where appellant simultaneously participated in two different drug organizations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green, Lally, Popovich, Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BarberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-03· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-15· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-11-05· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-07-19· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. BorzellecaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-27· cited 2×
- Com. v. Forrester-Westad, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-09-01· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. BracaliellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-16· cited 148×
- Commonwealth v. HunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-08· cited 139×
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-14· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-23· cited 114×
- Commonwealth v. FailorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-18· cited 47×
- Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-29· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. KeenanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-11· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. PeiferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-09· cited 20×
- Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-14· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. DeLongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-30· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. MattisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-05· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SchmotzerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-22· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-02· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. ShullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-08· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. M.D.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-25· cited 12×
- Techtmann v. HowieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-05· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.