Commonwealth v. Scesny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor improperly described evidence introduced by defendant as not material or relevant and therefore not to be considered as evidence
• \the prosecutor's characterization of his role as representing the 'citizens' ran the risk of suggesting that the prosecutor was representing the jurors-as-citizens against the defendant\
• criminologist could testify about whether semen deposits would typically appear on female's underwear if she pulled them up after having sexual intercourse with male
• experienced toxicologist with bachelor's degree in chemistry qualified as expert
• affirming petitioner’s conviction on July 14, 2015

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).