Commonwealth v. Saxton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that the trial court’s decision to remove a seated juror must be based on a sufficient record of competent evidence to sustain removal
• juror allegedly inattentive, yawning, continually dozing off

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-08· cited 145×
• Commonwealth v. Black
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 120×
• Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the Philadelphia
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-12-18· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Grassmyer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-04· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Jerry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 11×
• Stokes v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-11-05· cited 8×
• Hayes v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-05· cited 7×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1994-06-08· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Sawyer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 4×
• Stong v. PennDot
  Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-10-15· cited 1×