Commonwealth v. Savage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where business record that otherwise would be admissible under exception to hearsay rule contains hearsay, it is double hearsay, and underlying hearsay must also qualify as hearsay exception for a court to admit that portion of business record into evidence
• where business record that otherwise would be admissible under exception to hearsay rule contains hearsay, it is double hearsay, and underlying hearsay must also qualify as hearsay exception for a court to admit that portion of business record into evidence
• where business records that otherwise would be admissible under exception to hearsay rule contains hearsay, it is double hearsay, and underlying hearsay must also qualify as a hearsay exception for a court to admit that portion of the business record into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. McGriff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-04-21· cited 55×
• Com. v. Copenhaver, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-05-22· cited 12×
• Com. v. Copenhaver, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-05-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Yarris
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-05-21· cited 284×
• Commonwealth v. Mayhue
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-03-18· cited 87×
• Commonwealth v. Schoff
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-02· cited 81×
• Commonwealth v. McGowan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-09· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-24· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Sanchez
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-03· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Simmons
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-30· cited 3×