Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Saunders

Citations

  • 60 A.3d 162
  • 2013 Pa. Super. 9
  • 2013 WL 150811
  • 2013 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that decisions implicating federal habeas corpus law are “of no 8 The United States Supreme Court, in McQuiggin v. Perkins, 569 U.S. 383 (2013
  • holding that lowering the bar in federal habeas corpus law is not relevant to the way Pennsylvania courts apply the plain language of the PCRA’s time-bar exceptions
  • holding that lowering the bar in federal habeas corpus law is not relevant to the way Pennsylvania courts apply the plain language of the PCRA’s time-bar exceptions
  • holding that “while Martinez represents a significant development in federal habeas corpus law, it is of no moment with respect to the way Pennsylvania courts apply the plain language of the time bar set forth in section 9545(b)(1) of the PCRA.”
  • holding that “[w]hile Martinez represents a significant development in federal habeas corpus law, it is of no moment with respect to the way Pennsylvania courts apply the plain language of the time bar set forth in section 9545(b)(1) of the PCRA”
  • holding that “[w]hile Martinez represents a significant development in federal habeas corpus law, it is of no moment with respect to the way Pennsylvania courts apply the plain language of the time bar set forth in section 9545(b)(1) of the PCRA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Colville, Lazarus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.