Commonwealth v. Saunders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Prejudice in this context has been interpreted as being something which would detract from the probative value and reliability of the facts considered, vitiating the reliability of the outcome itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Ferguson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-10-19· cited 134×
• Commonwealth v. Sanders
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-17· cited 69×
• Commonwealth v. Clark
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-04-06· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Woods
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-02-04· cited 25×
• Com. v. Clayborne, L.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2026-03-27

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Commonwealth v. McClendon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-24· cited 771×
• Commonwealth v. Maple
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-08· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Marchesano
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-10· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. McCain
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-28· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Dickens
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Gee
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-24· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. McFarland
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-07-26· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Ballard
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-10-30· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Bradley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-14· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Dubuisson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-06· cited 5×
• Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc. v. State
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-01-20· cited 3×