· 11/15/2018
Commonwealth v. Satizabal, C.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that merely “mentioning” an improper factor, without more, is not reversible error
- “[N]o case has held that the district court abused its discretion by mentioning ‘respect for the law’ at a revocation hearing. The record must establish the district court ‘gave significant weight’ to an improper or irrelevant factor.”
- affirming the revocation and sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.