Skip to main content
· 11/15/2018

Commonwealth v. Satizabal, C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that merely “mentioning” an improper factor, without more, is not reversible error
  • “[N]o case has held that the district court abused its discretion by mentioning ‘respect for the law’ at a revocation hearing. The record must establish the district court ‘gave significant weight’ to an improper or irrelevant factor.”
  • affirming the revocation and sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.