Commonwealth v. Sarapa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, as a matter of first impression, that court lacked authority to restrict eligibility to intermediate punishment program by excluding DUI offenders, who were eligible based on statutory criteria
• observing DUI offenders “are eligible for [intermediate punishment programs] if it is their first, second, or third offense. 42 Pa.C.S. § 9804(b)(5)”
• rejecting county CIP plan that precluded CIP eligibility for all DUI' offenders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).