Commonwealth v. Santana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the warrant to detain appellant, officers ordering appellant to stop running, and officers informing appellant he was under arrest were sufficient to establish detention
• noting that the warrant to detain [the] appellant, officers[’] ordering [the] appellant to stop running, and officers[’] informing [the] appellant he was under arrest were sufficient to establish detention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Hopkins
  Third Circuit· 2009-08-21· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Treece
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-05-05· cited 4×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jarman
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 93×
• Commonwealth v. Swann
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-01-14· cited 52×
• Commonwealth v. Woody
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-12-05· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-10-13· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Colon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-17· cited 12×