Commonwealth v. Sanico, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where there was no evidence in record to suggest defendant was intentionally and purposefully singled out for invidious reason, selective prosecution defense not viable
• trial court properly concluded that company violated SWMA where evidence showed that it caused the transportation of waste in a vehicle that did not comply with DEP regulations even though “there was a ‘bonafide effort of the company personnel’ ... to comply with the regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).