Commonwealth v. Sands, R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not procedurally err or abuse its discretion in reimposing the same sentence in a one-paragraph explanation despite a guideline range that had been reduced by a subsequent guideline amendment
• finding no abuse of discretion and affirming denial of § 3582(c)(2) motion when the district court adhered to upward variance from initial sentencing “even with a modestly reduced advisory guideline”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).