Commonwealth v. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We do not have testimony or circumstances [from which] the jury could infer that there was presence in the house with no intent to commit a crime.\
• “[T]he trial court must instruct the jury according to the evidence. Here, Sanders’ defense was alibi. We do not have testimony or circumstances that the jury could infer that there was presence in the house with no intent to commit a crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Slaughter v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1987-11-05· cited 159×
• Perdue v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1996-03-21· cited 81×
• Hudson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-10-19· cited 68×
• Rogers v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-10-03· cited 37×
• Johnson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 35×
• Colwell v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2000-12-21· cited 34×
• Hayes v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Collins
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 27×
• Fields v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2008-10-23· cited 26×
• Callison v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-03-21· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1978-05-02· cited 40×
• Polk v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1978-07-21· cited 22×
• Patterson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1933-11-21· cited 9×