Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/25/2014
Commonwealth v. Safka
Citations
- 95 A.3d 304
- 2014 Pa. Super. 131
- 2014 WL 2881183
- 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reiterating that admissibility of expert scientific testimony will be reviewed for an abuse of the trial court’s discretion
- discussing the standards for admissibility of expert opinion testimony pursuant to the Frye test
- observing the Frye test is two-part, the first of which is, “the party opposing the evidence must show that the scientific evidence is ‘novel’ by demonstrating that there is a legitimate dispute regarding the reliability of the expert’s conclusions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Olson, Panella, Wecht
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Com. v. Cramer, R., IIISuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-09-06· cited 137×
- Com. v. Bonnett, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-09-22· cited 124×
- Commonwealth v. NevelsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-01-18· cited 52×
- Commonwealth v. SafkaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-07-19· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-25· cited 30×
- Com. v. Schultz, Jr., P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2015-05-04· cited 13×
- Com. v. Schofield, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-03-19· cited 10×
- State v. ByardSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-05-01
- State v. ByardSuperior Court of Delaware· 2018-05-03
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-12-31· cited 277×
- Commonwealth v. FoleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-15· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. HarrellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-04-12· cited 70×
- Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-07-29· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. MathisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-29· cited 35×
- Matos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-30· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermannMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2007-10-03· cited 15×
- State v. ShabazzNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-11-21· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.