Commonwealth v. Russell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[0]nly the person whose rights have been violated has standing to challenge [the validity of an order granting immunity]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Daniels
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-23· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Showers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-06-20· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Ward
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Schomaker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-30· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Pontious
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-05· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Rizzo
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-16· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Wardrop
  Crawford County Court of Common Pleas· 1975-03-31· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alderman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
• Brown v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1973-12-07· cited 1,232×
• James H. Ellis, Jr. v. United States of America, Alfred M. Watkins v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1969-04-30· cited 121×
• Commonwealth v. Butler
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-05-25· cited 80×
• James C. Long v. United States of America, Robree C. Earle v. United States of America, William E. Huff v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1966-06-23· cited 65×
• Marion C. Bowman v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1965-10-12· cited 49×
• United States v. William G. Le Pera
  Ninth Circuit· 1971-07-20· cited 39×
• United States v. Moses Lewis
  Third Circuit· 1972-03-07· cited 26×