· 10/15/1852
Commonwealth v. Rourke
Citations
- 64 Mass. 397
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- continued ques- tioning by the same deputies, without a break in time, and without an explanation that the prior statement could not be used, favored suppression
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cushing
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.