Commonwealth v. Rothensies
Citations
- 256 Pa. 337
- 100 A. 828
- 1917 Pa. LEXIS 611
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Trials—Improper remarles of counsel — Motion for continuance — Refusal.</p> <p>The refusal of'a motion for continuance, based upon improper ' remarks by the district attorney in his address to the jury, is not reversible error, where it appears that the remarks, complained of were called forth as a retort to remarks made by defendant’s counsel, and where it further appears that defendant’s rights were sufficiently protected by the trial judge in his charge to the jury.</p>
Judges: Brown, Frazer, Mestrezat, Mosohzisker, Potter, Stewart, Walling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.