Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/29/1898
Commonwealth v. Roth
Citations
- 8 Pa. Super. 220
- 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 43
Syllabus
<p>Practice, O. & T. — Motion to quash — Presumption—Appeal.</p> <p>Even if upon a motion to quash an indictment the court could receive proof of the facts alleged therein — a point not decided — it must be presumed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, that it heard the evidence and decided correctly.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Orlad, Porter, Reeder, Rice, Smith, Wickham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.