Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ross

Citations

  • 350 A.2d 836
  • 465 Pa. 421
  • 1976 Pa. LEXIS 430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • procedures that violate defendant’s constitutional rights are ultimately inefficient because they “give[] rise only to unnecessary appeals to this Court and unnecessary proceedings in the trial court”
  • abuse of discretion to refuse continuance where defendant was forced to trial with defense counsel who had inadequate time to prepare
  • abuse of discretion to refuse continuance where defendant was forced to trial with defense counsel who had inadequate time to prepare

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.