Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rosenbloom Finance Corp.

Citations

  • 457 Pa. 496
  • 325 A.2d 907
  • 1974 Pa. LEXIS 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “referential and qualifying words and phrases, where no contrary intention appears, refer solely to the last antecedent, which consists of ‘the last word, phrase or clause that can be made an antecedent without impairing the meaning of the sentence’ ” (citations omitted)
  • stating that “referential and qualifying words and phrases, where no contrary intention appears, refer solely to the last antecedent, which consists of ‘the last word, phrase, or clause that can be made an antecedent without impairing the meaning of the sentence’ ” (citations omitted)
  • “When several words are followed by a modifying phrase which is applicable as much to the first and other words as to the last, the natural construction of the language demands that the modifying phrase be read as applicable to all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brien, Eagen, Jones, Manderino, Nix, Pomeroy, Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Rosenbloom Finance Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.