Commonwealth v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Judges ‘do not possess authority unilaterally to reduce the level of charge brought by the prosecutor’ ”
• trial judge did not possess authority to accept, over Commonwealth’s objection, defendant’s plea of guilty to driving while under influence, third offense, where defendant had been charged with driving while under influence, fourth offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hamilton
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2013-03-13· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Pelletier
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2007-06-26· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Dean-Ganek
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-01-12· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Gordon
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-07-01· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Hart
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-03-01· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Lowder
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-07-10· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-07-16· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Peterson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-06-06· cited 6×