Commonwealth v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• possession of gambling devices, per se, is not tantamount to “maintaining”
• warranted search of appellant’s vehicle produced cases of lottery tickets, punch boards, price lists and a notebook with locations, by name, address and phone number in the vicinity of his arrest; albeit evidence was sufficient to prove a violation of Section 5512(b)(2
• Per Curiam Opinion, JUDGE PRICE dissented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dumont
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-23· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. Bretz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-24· cited 10×
• United States Ex Rel. Smith v. Robinson
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-07-31· cited 8×
• In re Catering Club Liquor License No. CC-4837
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-21· cited 7×
• United States v. Conley
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-09-03· cited 6×
• United States v. Conley
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-02-03· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Freeman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-18

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lockhart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-16· cited 117×