Commonwealth v. Rosario

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 9781(f) deprives the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to review the discretionary aspects of a sentence
• “We hold that once a party is found guilty, the adjudicated elements of the offense must be fully considered and cannot be disregarded when fashioning a sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Cartrette
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-12-24· cited 1,101×
• Commonwealth v. Rigg
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-01-27· cited 378×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-29· cited 170×
• Commonwealth v. King
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-06· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Myers
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-07-22· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-13