Commonwealth v. Romero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence jury could consider included testimony of handwriting expert that “a great many names” appeared to have been written by the same person
• the defendant was charged under G. L. c. 56, § 11, as well as the perjury statute, G. L. c. 268, § 1A; both convictions were upheld
• violation of Mass.R.Crim.P. 20[e][3] did not warrant reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Katsirubis
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-06-25· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Murphy
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-10-15· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Hearn
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1991-12-30· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Freeman
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1967-06-01· cited 628×
• Commonwealth v. Waters
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-04-23· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Ford
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-04-14· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1985-08-08· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Davila
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1984-02-16· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Ford
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-08-13· cited 8×