Massachusetts Appeals Court· 5/13/2009
Commonwealth v. Roman
Citations
- 74 Mass. App. Ct. 251
- 905 N.E.2d 1119
- 2009 Mass. App. LEXIS 651
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant drove vehicle in manner to support inference that defendant participated in venture with other occupants of car to traffic cocaine and sought to make venture succeed
- sufficient facts to support joint venture where defendant attempted to conceal transfer of narcotics by another
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. AmaralMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-02-25· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. SaezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1986-01-13· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. SeminaraMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1985-09-23· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-02-17· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. OrtizMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-03-27· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. LunaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-15· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. CaramanicaMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2000-06-08· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. TracyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-06-19· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. AhartMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1994-10-21· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. FoleyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1979-05-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.