Commonwealth v. Rogers
Citations
- 15 Pa. Super. 461
- 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 381
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Proceedings in desertion — Limited jurisdiction of appellate courts.</p> <p>Proceedings under the Act of April 13, 1867, P. L. 78, which provides for relief of wives and children deserted by husband and father are not reviewable on the merits. The revisory jurisdiction of the appellate courts was not enlarged by the Acts of May 9, 1889, P. L. 158, or June 24,1895, P. L. 212.</p> <p>The evidence cannot be brought upon the record and the appellate court will not decide that a reason given by the court below was illegal when it would be improper to do so without examining the facts developed on the hearing, and reviewing the case on its merits.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Ctteiam, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TragleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-03-17· cited 26×
- Commonwealth v. JamesPhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1891-04-27· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. HartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-02-16· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-04-23· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.