Commonwealth v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in order to establish a prima facie case, the Commonwealth must show that a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably the one who committed it
• in order to establish a prima facie case, the Commonwealth must show that a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably the one who committed it
• “[E]ven upon successful completion [of ARD program], the DUI charge would still be considered a first conviction for the purpose of computing sentencing for subsequent violations.” (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Garcia
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-02· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Galan
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1995-01-30
• City of Golden Valley v. One 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix, Vin 1g2wp521wf309530, Pennsylvania License Plate P520111
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-09-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. McBride
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-08-01· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Genovese
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-04· cited 122×
• Commonwealth v. Weitkamp
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-28· cited 42×
• Jones v. Trojak
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-07-29· cited 23×
• Bartle v. Bartle
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-24· cited 11×