Commonwealth v. Roe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where charges against defendant were dismissed for want of prosecution, court stated that defendant’s motion to expunge was properly denied because existence of sealing statute, G. L. c. 276, § 100C, provided remedy to protect confidentiality of criminal records

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commissioner of Probation v. Adams
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-03-10· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Boe
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-25· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Roberts
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1995-10-30· cited 11×
• Commonwealth v. S.M.F.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-02-07· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Boe
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-02-05· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Vickey
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-11-17· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Balboni
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-11-21· cited 16×