Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 10/17/1988
Commonwealth v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 548 A.2d 1211
- 519 Pa. 415
- 1988 Pa. LEXIS 249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that one-party consensual wiretapping, as authorized by section 5704(2)(ii), does not violate the Fourth Amendment or Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution
- construing Pa. Const. Art. 1, sec. 8 in accordance with Fourth Amendment precedent
- construing Pa. Const. Art. 1, sec. 8 in accordance with Fourth Amendment precedent
- upholding interceptions of oral communications made pursuant to § 5704(2)(ii) of the Wiretap Act in the face of challenges under Article I, Section 8, by citing Blystone but without specifically discussing the issue of interceptions made in a private residence
- upholding interceptions of oral communications made pursuant to § 5704(2)(ii) of the Wiretap Act in the face of challenges under Article I, Section 8, by citing Blystone but without specifically discussing the issue of interceptions made in a private residence
- one-party consensual electronic interception of communications regarding a drug transaction did not violate Article I, § 8
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala, Papadakos, Stout
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-30· cited 107×
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 80×
- Commonwealth v. RickabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-18· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. DeBlaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-29· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-06-14· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. ArdestaniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-29· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-16· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. FowlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-11-20· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. WitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-28· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-16· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. BangoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-11-04· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. BrionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-12· cited 16×
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Dunnavant, G.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-29· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-03-09· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-05· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. BenderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-10-25· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-25· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. ParrellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-03· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-25· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. BaroneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-04-05· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 983×
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court· 1979-04-13· cited 883×
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 854×
- Commonwealth v. BlystoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-17· cited 180×
- Commonwealth v. MamonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-17· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. AlstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. StetlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-08· cited 28×
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-07· cited 17×
- United States v. JohnsonE.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-07-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.