Commonwealth v. Rodland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Maxwell makes clear that [an] Appellant is at least entitled to a hearing” to determine if charges were nolle prossed pursuant to a plea agreement
• Commonwealth may avoid expungement in cases of partial acquittal only when it demonstrates to the trial court that expungement is impractical or impossible under the circumstances
• where the defendant is acquitted of some charges and not others, the court should expunge the acquitted charges unless the Commonwealth \demonstrates to the trial court that expungement is impractical or impossible under the circumstances\
• where the defendant is acquitted of some charges and not others, the court should expunge the acquitted charges unless the Commonwealth “demonstrates to the trial court that expungement is impractical or impossible under the circumstances”
• where the defendant is acquitted of some charges and not others, the court should expunge the acquitted charges unless the Commonwealth “demonstrates to the trial court that expungement is impractical or impossible under the circumstances”
• where the defendant is acquitted of some charges and not others, the court should expunge the acquitted charges unless the Commonwealth \demonstrates to the trial court that expungement is impractical or impossible under the circumstances\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).