Commonwealth v. Roberts, S., Pet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in reviewing content-neutral regulations burdening speech under an intermediate scrutiny standard, the question for the courts “is whether the legislative conclusion was reasonable and supported by substantial evidence in the record before [the legislative body]”
• concluding federal government had substantial interest in promoting fair competition in market for television programming
• concluding federal government had substantial interest in promoting fair competition in market for television programming
• explaining that the Cable Act's retransmission consent provision reflects the \popularity and strength of some broadcasters\
• noting that the congressional record included “years of testimony and reviewing volumes of documentary evidence and studies offered by both sides” compiled three years of hearings
• noting that the congressional record included \years of testimony and reviewing volumes of documentary evidence and studies offered by both sides\ compiled three years of hearings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).