Skip to main content
· 9/25/2018

Commonwealth v. Rivers, R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding whether the appointment of the Board's members without Senate confirmation violated the Appointments Clause, U.S. Const. Art. II, § 2, cl. 2
  • upholding the constitutionality of the appointment process for the Board's members
  • first citing Am. Ins. Co. v. 356 Bales of Cotton, 26 U.S. 511, 546 (1828); then citing Palmore v. United States, 411 U.S. 389, 407 (1973)
  • “[T]he Appointments Clause helps to preserve democratic accountability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.