Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/6/1987
Commonwealth v. Rivera
Citations
- 365 Pa. Super. 361
- 529 A.2d 1099
- 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 8739
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering a claim that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to consider the alternatives to incarceration as a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Files, Hoffman, Olszewski, Wieand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-24· cited 146×
- Commonwealth v. DrumgooleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-08· cited 70×
- Daly v. Darby Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-04-23· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-19· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. GumpertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-18· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-26· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. HelmsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-27· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. StoppieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. LahoudSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-01· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. DixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-01-14· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. DoughertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-03-20· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. EasterlingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-12· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-17· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.