Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Rivera

Citations

  • 154 A.3d 370
  • 2017 Pa. Super. 14
  • 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding whether an appellant received the sentence he bargained for was a highly relevant factor in the Flores-Ortega inquiry
  • “Our cases clearly state that a criminal defendant cannot agree to an illegal sentence, so the fact that the illegality was a term of his plea bargain is of no legal significance.”
  • “Our cases clearly state that a criminal defendant cannot agree to an illegal sentence, so the fact that the illegality was a term of his plea bargain is of no legal significance.”
  • “[o]ur cases clearly state that a criminal defendant cannot agree to an illegal sentence, so the fact that the illegality was a term of his plea bargain is of no legal significance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender, Bowes, Elliott, Gantman, Lazarus, Olson, Ott, Panella, Shogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.