Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2/11/1983
Commonwealth v. Rineer
Citations
- 456 A.2d 591
- 310 Pa. Super. 241
- 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2558
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring a specific objection after the charge is read to the jury in order to preserve an issue, even where the jury instructions have been timely offered and refused
- requiring a specific objection after the charge is read to the jury in order to preserve an issue, even where the jury instructions have been timely offered and refused
- in order to preserve issues regarding a charge to the jury, a specific objection must be made, even where jury instructions have been timely offered and refused
- in order to preserve issues regarding a charge to the jury, a specific objection must be made, even where jury instructions have been timely offered and refused
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, Brosky, Wieand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.