Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/11/1984
Commonwealth v. Richardson
Citations
- 473 A.2d 1361
- 504 Pa. 358
- 1984 Pa. LEXIS 231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there are valid reasons not to ask questions concerning racial issues even in a case where the victim is white and the defendant is black
- noting that there are valid reasons not to ask questions concerning racial issues even in a case where the victim is white and the defendant is black
- the mere fact that a black man was charged with raping a white woman did not imbue the case with heightened racial sensitivity requiring specific voir dire on racial bias
- the mere fact that a black man was charged with raping a white woman did not imbue the case with heightened racial sensitivity requiring specific voir dire on racial bias
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaherty, Larsen, Nix
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SteeleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-18· cited 284×
- Commonwealth v. DeHartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-03· cited 145×
- Commonwealth v. HenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-23· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. MarreroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-26· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-11· cited 44×
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-06-11· cited 34×
- Commonwealth v. HackettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-08-09· cited 25×
- Reynolds v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-04-05· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. GlaspySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-13· cited 10×
- Hackett v. PriceE.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-08-06· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. SlocumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-22· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. Walker, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-08-19
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ham v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1973-01-17· cited 622×
- Schwartz v. Defender Ass'n of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court· 1973-12-03· cited 74×
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-11-24· cited 53×
- Commonwealth v. ChristianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 39×
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-12-03· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-24· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.