Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 3/29/1989
Commonwealth v. Richards
Citations
- 556 A.2d 510
- 124 Pa. Commw. 432
- 1989 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 192
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reasonable access to property was denied where landowner could not access his property without scraping the bottom of his vehicle
- holding that reasonable access to property was denied where landowner could not access his property without scraping the bottom of his vehicle
- finding compensation warranted where the landowner was unable to enter his property without scraping the bottom of his vehicle due to grading differences caused by the government’s construction project
- right of access to one’s property is defined as right to reasonable ingress and egress to the property.
- right of access to one's property is defined as right to reasonable ingress and egress to the property.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doyle, Colins, Barbieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elser v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-12-02· cited 24×
- Thomas A. McElwee & Son, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-02· cited 23×
- Newman v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-22· cited 12×
- Reynolds v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-10· cited 9×
- Maurizi v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-01· cited 8×
- Sienkiewicz v. COM. DEPT. OF TRANSP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-09-28· cited 7×
- Amoroso v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-11· cited 7×
- Thomas A. McElwee & Son, Inc. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-04-06· cited 6×
- In re De Facto Condemnation ex rel. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-11· cited 5×
- Jackson Gear Co. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-20· cited 5×
- Harrington v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-02-21· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. ElserCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-07· cited 2×
- Sienkiewicz v. PennDOTLackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2003-05-02· cited 1×
- In re Appeal from 1985 Report of AuditorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-28
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court· 1964-08-20· cited 119×
- In re Melon StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-10-11· cited 64×
- Hession Condemnation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-05-21· cited 63×
- Wolf v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-06-24· cited 59×
- Rhoads Et Ux. v. Lancaster Park. Auth.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-22· cited 58×
- Hedrick v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-06-23· cited 24×
- County of Schuylkill v. MaurerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-26· cited 13×
- Bayush v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-14· cited 11×
- MOYER Et Ux. v. CommonwealthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 11×
- Department of Highways AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-23· cited 10×
- Montour Sch. D. v. Pa. Human Rel. Comm.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-08-26· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. GuyetteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-30· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.